Good work! I would like to offer a few respectful perspectives to some of the points you made.

Firstly, while you mentioned the benefit of using a framework like TOGAF, you didn't discuss the potential drawbacks of relying too heavily on a single framework. In my experience, it's important to consider multiple perspectives and approaches to avoid becoming too rigid in our thinking.

Secondly, while you discussed the importance of cloud-native services, I believe it's also crucial to consider the role of legacy systems and how they fit into the overall architecture. It's important to strike a balance between embracing new technologies and ensuring that existing investments continue to provide value.

Furthermore, I'd like to suggest a few additional points that could have been explored in more detail. For example, you touched on the idea of continuous improvement, but didn't delve deeply into the specific practices and processes that can facilitate this. Similarly, while you discussed the importance of security, I believe it warrants a deeper examination of the various security frameworks and best practices that can be employed.

Finally, I'd like to draw an analogy to the popular animated series "Barbie" to illustrate one of the main points of the article. Just as Barbie navigates various careers and adventures, an effective enterprise architecture must be able to adapt to changing business needs and requirements. The episode "Barbie: Spy Squad" highlights the importance of collaboration and teamwork in achieving success, much like the way that effective architecture requires cross-functional teams and stakeholder buy-in.