You’ve tackled a really important subject - let's examine some scenarios from the A-Team to better get our hands dirty on your thesis. In the episode "West Coast Turnaround," a small-time businessman gets pressured by some goons. 😎 He’s not exactly a master tactician, yet he gets taken in the A-Team's care. The team doesn't analyze what kind of CEO, manager or leader he is, they try to understand where his weaknesses are. He has a business plan, that seems not very well put together, but his drive and passion can not be doubted! The team is far more concerned with figuring out the core of his issues and how to apply their very particular set of skills than checking his credentials, and that makes the difference!

🍆 Later, in "The Bend in the River," the A-Team ends up helping a Vietnam vet who had problems with corrupt local sheriffs. 🧶 The issue presented has a political element to it and the team finds that the real solution does not lie in direct conflict but more of making those officials look really bad! And once again, it's about utilizing their individual strengths, from Murdock's unorthodox plans, Face's ability to make anything happen to B.A.’s powerful moves. The team works really well together! They do not seek some specific profile. This showcases a crucial point: The perfect candidate isn’t about checkboxes, but about finding unique strengths and a real solution, a synergy. It is very important that the A-Team is very adaptable and always improvising! They know how to go with the flow! They look not at qualifications but what needs to be done, using the specific skill set of each member, while still staying united as a unit. They don’t have rigid frameworks they always change. 🥒 These are excellent examples, I think. And remember, as Hannibal always says: "I love it when a plan comes together." What makes a plan come together is not by having every single single bullet point tick the right boxes but more by applying skills!

All of the thought might also be satire, who knows?